Wednesday, February 18, 2026

Opening Talk: Regenerative Farming for Farm Survival and Renewal

  Opening Talk: Regenerative Farming for Farm Survival and Renewal

Friends and neighbors,

I want to begin by saying something simple and honest:
Farming is getting harder, not easier.

Many of you are facing rising costs for fertilizer, herbicides, pesticides, diesel, and seed. Every year it seems like you have to spend more just to grow the same crop, on the same ground, for the same or even lower price. And too often, after all the work and all the risk, there’s not much left over for your family or your future.

You are not failing.
The system is failing you.

The industrial chemical model of agriculture has locked farmers into a cycle of dependency—buying more inputs each year while soil health declines, water runs off, and debt piles up. It’s a treadmill that keeps speeding up.

But there is another path forward. And it’s being proven by farmers across this country and around the world.

That path is called regenerative agriculture.

Regenerative farming is based on a simple idea:
When we work with nature instead of against it, the land becomes more productive, more resilient, and less expensive to operate.

Healthy soil is not just dirt—it’s a living system. When soil is alive with microbes, fungi, and organic matter, it can feed plants naturally, hold water like a sponge, resist drought, and reduce pests and disease without constant chemical intervention. In a regenerative system, fertility comes from biology, not from a bag or a jug.

A key part of this process is restoring carbon to the soil. Carbon is the foundation of soil fertility. When we build soil carbon through cover crops, diverse plantings, compost, and managed grazing, we increase organic matter. That organic matter allows soil to hold more water, store more nutrients, and remain productive even in drought or heavy rain. More carbon in the soil means healthier crops, healthier pastures, and less dependence on purchased fertilizers. It also helps stabilize the climate by storing carbon safely underground where it belongs, instead of losing it to the atmosphere. In simple terms: when carbon returns to the soil, life returns to the soil—and the farm becomes more resilient and productive.

Farmers who have made this transition have found something remarkable. As they rebuild their soil and diversify their operations, they often cut their input costs dramatically—sometimes by half, sometimes by far more. That means more money stays in the farmer’s pocket instead of going to chemical and seed corporations.

These regenerative systems rely on a few core principles:
Keep living roots in the soil.
Keep the soil covered.
Increase plant diversity.
Integrate livestock in a managed way that mimics nature.
Minimize disturbance from excessive tillage and chemicals.

When those principles are followed, something powerful happens. Soil organic matter increases. Rain soaks in instead of running off. Pastures grow thicker. Crops become more resilient. Livestock become healthier. And farms begin to regain their profitability and independence.

This isn’t theory. It’s happening right now on real farms run by practical people who were once in the same position many of you are in—facing rising costs, declining soil, and uncertain futures. They didn’t change because it was trendy. They changed because they needed their farms to survive.

And the benefits go far beyond the farm gate.
Cleaner water.
Healthier food.
Stronger rural communities.
Less chemical exposure for farm families and neighbors.
Land that improves, instead of wearing out.

Regenerative agriculture is called regenerative for a reason: it restores what has been depleted. It rebuilds soil instead of stripping it. It restores water cycles instead of draining them. It strengthens farm economics instead of undermining them.

Most importantly, it offers hope.

No one is saying this transition happens overnight. It takes learning, observation, and sometimes starting small—one field, one pasture, one new practice at a time. But the evidence is growing every year that farms can reduce dependence on expensive inputs and move toward systems that are healthier, more resilient, and more profitable.

This conversation isn’t about politics or ideology.
It’s about survival.
It’s about keeping farms on the land.
It’s about making sure the next generation has something worth inheriting.

If we can rebuild our soils, we can rebuild our farms.
If we can rebuild our farms, we can rebuild our rural communities.
And if we do it right, we can leave this land better than we found it.

Thank you for being willing to listen, to share, and to consider that a different path forward is possible—for your farm, your family, and the generations that come after us.


5-Minute Opening Talk: Regenerative Farming for Farm Survival and Renewal** 

 Friends and neighbors, I want to begin by saying something simple and honest: Farming is getting harder, not easier. Many of you are facing rising costs for fertilizer, herbicides, pesticides, diesel, and seed. Every year it seems like you have to spend more just to grow the same crop, on the same ground, for the same or even lower price. And too often, after all the work and all the risk, there’s not much left over for your family or your future. You are not failing. The system is failing you.

 The industrial chemical model of agriculture has locked farmers into a cycle of dependency—buying more inputs each year while soil health declines, water runs off, and debt piles up. It’s a treadmill that keeps speeding up. But there is another path forward. And it’s being proven by farmers across this country and around the world. That path is called regenerative agriculture. Regenerative farming is based on a simple idea: When we work with nature instead of against it, the land becomes more productive, more resilient, and less expensive to operate. Healthy soil is not just dirt—it’s a living system. When soil is alive with microbes, fungi, and organic matter, it can feed plants naturally, hold water like a sponge, resist drought, and reduce pests and disease without constant chemical intervention. In a regenerative system, fertility comes from biology, not from a bag or a jug.

 Farmers who have made this transition have found something remarkable. As they rebuild their soil and diversify their operations, they often cut their input costs dramatically—sometimes by half, sometimes by far more. That means more money stays in the farmer’s pocket instead of going to chemical and seed corporations. 

 These regenerative systems rely on a few core principles: Keep living roots in the soil. Keep the soil covered. Increase plant diversity. Integrate livestock in a managed way that mimics nature. Minimize disturbance from excessive tillage and chemicals. When those principles are followed, something powerful happens. Soil organic matter increases. Rain soaks in instead of running off. Pastures grow thicker. Crops become more resilient. Livestock become healthier. And farms begin to regain their profitability and independence. This isn’t theory. It’s happening right now on real farms run by practical people who were once in the same position many of you are in—facing rising costs, declining soil, and uncertain futures. 

They didn’t change because it was trendy. They changed because they needed their farms to survive. And the benefits go far beyond the farm gate. Cleaner water. Healthier food. Stronger rural communities. Less chemical exposure for farm families and neighbors. Land that improves instead of wearing out. Regenerative agriculture is called regenerative for a reason: it restores what has been depleted. It rebuilds soil instead of stripping it. It restores water cycles instead of draining them. It strengthens farm economics instead of undermining them. Most importantly, it offers hope. 

 No one is saying this transition happens overnight. It takes learning, observation, and sometimes starting small—one field, one pasture, one new practice at a time. But the evidence is growing every year that farms can reduce dependence on expensive inputs and move toward systems that are healthier, more resilient, and more profitable.

 This conversation isn’t about politics or ideology. It’s about survival. It’s about keeping farms on the land. It’s about making sure the next generation has something worth inheriting. If we can rebuild our soils, we can rebuild our farms. If we can rebuild our farms, we can rebuild our rural communities. And if we do it right, we can leave this land better than we found it. Thank you for being willing to listen, to share, and to consider that a different path forward is possible—for your farm, your family, and the generations that come after us. :::

Introduction Plan; Regenerative Agriculture Alternatives for Struggling Farmers.

 

Introduction Plan: Regenerative Alternatives for Struggling Farmers

1. Start with the Farmer’s Reality

  • Acknowledge the struggle:
    “You’re not alone. Many farmers are squeezed by rising costs for seed, fertilizer, chemicals, and fuel, while the price for your crops or livestock hasn’t kept up. The current system is breaking farmers, not supporting them.”

  • Set the stage:
    “We don’t have to keep going broke buying the same poisons and inputs year after year. There’s another way.”


2. Introduce the Core Idea

Regenerative Agriculture — working with nature instead of against it.

  • Joel Salatin: stacked enterprises, direct markets, and farm diversity that create more profit per acre.

  • Gabe Brown: soil health principles that eliminate dependence on expensive chemicals.

  • Allan Savory: holistic planned grazing that heals grasslands and restores water cycles.

  • Soil Carbon Cowboys: real farmers who cut costs, built soil, and brought life back to their farms without relying on chemical companies.


3. Why Regenerative Systems Work

  • Soil is alive: Healthy soil organisms cycle nutrients, hold water, and replace chemical fertilizers.

  • Diversity creates resilience: More species = fewer pests, less disease, better drought resistance.

  • Livestock as partners: Managed grazing mimics natural herd movement, regenerating grasslands.

  • Lower costs, higher profits: By cutting inputs, farmers reduce debt and keep more money.

  • Health benefits: Cleaner food, water, and air for farm families and rural communities.


4. Frame It in Economic Terms First

  • “This isn’t about being ‘organic’ or chasing a trend—it’s about keeping your farm in business.”

  • Share numbers or case studies: farmers who cut fertilizer and pesticide costs by 50–90%, or who doubled soil organic matter in a few years.

  • Stress: Regenerative farming doesn’t rely on chemical corporations. It gives farmers independence.


5. Show, Don’t Just Tell

  • Invite them to watch a short Soil Carbon Cowboys video—peer-to-peer examples are powerful.

  • If possible, schedule a field walk or demo plot showing cover crops, grazing paddocks, or soil infiltration tests.

  • Farmers trust other farmers more than experts—lean on real-world success stories.


6. Extend the Invitation

  • “This isn’t a quick fix, but it’s a proven path forward. You can start small—on one field, with one practice, with one herd rotation.”

  • Provide resources (local mentors, videos, workshops, or books).

  • Leave them with hope: “Regeneration is about more than farming—it’s about leaving something better for your kids and grandkids, while making the farm pay again.”

Wednesday, December 17, 2025

Establishing Local and Regional Food Production and Distribution. Regenerative Agriculture Systems.

 Farmers and the American food system will never have a secure supply stream in the long term as long as they are dependent on long supply chains of expensive inputs from distant sources. Farmers and the American food system will never be a secure supply system if dependent on toxic chemicals that pollute water and destroy soil ecology and biodiversity. Farmers and the American food system will never be a secure supply system if they are dependent on mega corporations for processing and distribution that keep the largest share of the profits customers pay.

The investor, owner, and banker classes have bought our country. That is America, the businesses, the political systems, the politicians, and even the policies and tax breaks they wanted. They have monopolized most of the important and necessary industries: food production and distribution, health care, energy, etc. The broadcast media (Free Press), even the print media and social media, are now controlled by a few giant corporations.

Thomas Jefferson argued that the Bill of Rights must include a ban of monopoly corporations. See the collected, The Works of Thomas Jefferson. Sadly, that was not added to our Bill of Rights.

The giant monopolies and tech giants have destroyed the local mom-and-pop businesses that were the backbone of America. They have even acquired many of the excellent small and regional chains that used to serve the people and their local needs.

Until we deal with the agribusiness monopolies like JBS, ADM, Tyson, and Bayer, and giant fossil fuel corporations that distort fair market pricing, this will continue. The giant agricultural and fossil fuel corporations corrupt our political systems and politicians. The climate crisis can be seen purely as science, but must be addressed as both a political and economic issue as well.

We must reestablish local production that is controlled and distributed locally and nationally. If we are depending on distant supply chains and markets created by giant monopolies and mega money corporations, we will not have stable or sustainable economic systems.

Taxing corporations and monopolies fairly is necessary and important, but not enough. Taxes on investment income and capital gains must be brought up to at least or above the rates that working-class people pay, but this still does not solve the problem. We must make working-class people the owners and investors.

We saw what happened with the supply chains during the pandemic. Farmers and the American food system will never be a secure supply system long-term as long as they are dependent on government subsidies. The development of localized food production, in the form of cooperatives and worker-owned and directed businesses, is a worker-owned cooperative or company. The employee stock ownership plan (ESOP), or other forms of profit-sharing and reinvestment plans will benefit both the company and the workers. Local supply systems benefit the customer in price and dependability. Worker-owned businesses will begin to take power away from the monopoly agribusinesses that exploit almost everyone, from the beginning of the supply chain to the end. The best way to ensure efficiency, fairness, and equity is the worker-owned cooperative, and locally or regionally owned business.

The USDA under Robert Kennedy just released 700 million in a program to help better establish regenerative agriculture and ranching in the United States. There was a large amount of money budgeted for establishing more local butchers and local or regional processing during the Biden administration. Decentralization of production will make the supply chains more secure and stable.

Developing a plan for enhancing systems for local butcher and slaughter processing, as well as strengthening local regenerative produce and dairy supply lines, involves several strategic steps. Here is the beginning of a comprehensive approach:

The USDA under Robert Kennedy just released 700 million in a program to help better establish regenerative agriculture and ranching in the United States. There was a large amount of money budgeted for establishing more local butchers and local or regional processing during the Biden administration. Decentralization of production will make the supply chains more secure and stable.

Developing a plan for enhancing systems for local butcher and slaughter processing, as well as strengthening local regenerative produce and dairy supply lines, involves several strategic steps. Here is the beginning of a comprehensive approach:



1. Assessment of Local Needs and Resources

  • Community Survey: Conduct surveys or hold community meetings to understand the specific needs, preferences, and concerns of local farmers, consumers, and potential business operators.

  • Resource Inventory: Identify available resources, including land, facilities, equipment, and local farms that can supply raw materials.

2. Building Infrastructure

  • Facility Development: Secure funding or grants for building local processing facilities such as butchers, dairies, and slaughterhouses. Consider modular systems or co-operative styles that allow for shared use.

  • Community Ownership Models: Establish cooperatives where local farmers and community members can invest and share in ownership, which allows for profit retention within the community.

3. Regulatory Framework

  • Navigating Regulations: Collaborate with local, state, and federal regulatory bodies to understand food safety, health standards, and zoning laws. Advocate for policies that support local processing facilities.

  • Training and Certification: Provide training programs for local butchers and dairy processors for them to understand and comply with industry standards.

4. Establishing Supply Chains

  • Local Sourcing Agreements: Promote agreements between farmers and processors to ensure a steady supply of ingredients. This can be facilitated through local farmer's markets and community-supported agriculture (CSA) programs.

  • Direct Market Relationships: Encourage the establishment of direct sales from farmers to processors to eliminate middlemen and ensure fair pricing.

5. Marketing and Community Engagement

  • Raising Awareness: Launch marketing campaigns to educate the community about the benefits of local food systems, including sustainability, health benefits, and economic impact.

  • Educational Workshops: Host workshops that demonstrate the advantages of purchasing locally processed meat and dairy, fostering a culture of local support.

6. Financial Support and Incentives

  • Access to Capital: Create local investment groups or crowdfunding campaigns to support initial setup costs for local processing facilities.

  • Government and Non-Profit Partnerships: Seek funding from grants, subsidies, and organizations that support local agriculture and food security initiatives.

7. Utilizing Technology

  • Supply Chain Management Software: Invest in or develop software solutions that help local producers, processors, and consumers better manage their supply chains and sales.

  • Online Marketplaces: Establish online platforms for local farmers and producers to sell their products directly to consumers, enhancing visibility and access.

8. Monitoring and Evaluation

  • Performance Metrics: Develop metrics to assess the effectiveness of the local food system, including economic impact, consumer health outcomes, and environmental benefits.

  • Continuous Feedback Loop: Create avenues for ongoing feedback from community members and stakeholders to continually adapt and improve the system.

Conclusion

By focusing on localized production through cooperatives, fostering regulatory awareness, and leveraging community support and resources, it’s possible to create a robust local butcher and slaughter processing environment, alongside sustainable dairy and produce supply lines. The shift towards a more resilient and equitable food system can diminish dependence on distant supply chains and better support healthy local economies.













Establishing a local meat processing business can require significant capital investment, but there are various funding options available to help entrepreneurs secure the necessary resources. Here are some potential funding sources:

1. Grants

  • USDA Grants: The United States Department of Agriculture offers various grants that support local food systems and rural development, such as the Farmers Market Promotion Program or the local food production grants.

  • State and Local Grants: Many states and local governments provide grants specifically for agricultural development, food processing, or rural economic development.

  • Non-Profit Organizations: Some non-profits and foundations focus on strengthening local food systems and may offer grants for specific projects or initiatives.

2. Loans

  • USDA Rural Development Loans: These loans are designed to support rural businesses, including meat processing facilities, with favorable terms and low-interest rates.

  • Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs): CDFIs provide loans and financial services to under served communities, including agricultural businesses.

  • Bank Loans: Traditional banks and credit unions may offer business loans, though terms can vary significantly based on the lender and the business’s financial health.

3. Crowdfunding

  • Online Platforms: Websites like Kickstarter, Indiegogo, and GoFundMe allow entrepreneurs to raise small amounts of money from a large number of people who are interested in supporting local food initiatives.

  • Community-Supported Agriculture (CSA): In a CSA model, consumers can pre-purchase shares in the expected harvest (or products), providing upfront capital for the business.

4. Cooperative Investment

  • Member Contributions: If establishing a cooperative processing facility, members (local farmers or consumers) can invest directly into the operation, providing initial capital and ensuring local buy-in.

  • Equity Shares: Offer equity shares to local community members and farmers in exchange for upfront capital, giving them a stake in the business’s success.

5. Angel Investors

  • Private Investors: Seek out individuals or groups of investors who are interested in sustainable agriculture and local food systems. They may provide capital in exchange for equity or a share of the profits.

6. Venture Capital

  • Agri-Tech and Local Food Funds: Some venture capital firms focus on sustainable agriculture and food processing. They typically seek businesses with high growth potential and may offer large sums of capital.

7. Economic Development Programs

  • Local Economic Development Agencies: Many regions have economic development programs that provide funding, incentives, or resources to support local businesses, especially in rural areas.

  • Industry Associations: Industry groups may have resources or programs available to support local meat processors through grants, loans, or mentorship.

8. Business Competitions

  • Pitch Competitions: Entrepreneurs can enter competitions designed to support small businesses where winners receive funding, mentorship, or resources to launch their business.

9. Tax Incentives

  • Tax Credit Programs: Some localities offer tax incentives for businesses that improve local food systems, which can indirectly provide financial relief and improve cash flow.

10. Personal Investment

  • Self-Funding: Use personal savings or assets to fund the initial establishment of the business. This often requires weighing the risks and benefits carefully.

Conclusion

By exploring a combination of these funding sources, entrepreneurs can secure the financial support needed to establish a local meat processing business, promoting sustainable practices and strengthening local food systems.

Federal funding to establish and expand local and regional meat processing, initiated by the Biden-Harris administration (totaling over $1 billion), was still being awarded through late 2024. While specific programs like the 2023 Local Meat Capacity (Local MCap) grants closed, the USDA continues to invest in diversifying meat processing to increase competition.
Key Details on Funding Availability:
  • Active Investments: In September 2024, the USDA announced over $35 million in new grants for independent processors to expand capacity.
  • Meat and Poultry Processing Expansion Program (MPPEP): This program has provided multiple phases of funding for new facilities and renovations.
  • Local MCap Grant Program: Focused on helping smaller, independent, or traditional processors with equipment and modernization.
  • Where to Check: Interested parties should monitor the USDA Rural Development programs and the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service Local MCap website for new,, announcements or funding opportunities.

Current Status: The focus has been on supporting independent processors to provide alternatives to the "Big Four" packers, with funds largely derived from the American Rescue Plan Act.



















Enhancing local butcher and slaughter processing involves a series of strategic steps aimed at building a sustainable and efficient system. Here are the key steps to consider:

1. Feasibility Study

  • Market Analysis: Assess the demand for local meat processing services, identifying potential customers (restaurants, markets, etc.) and competition.

  • Resource Assessment: Evaluate available resources, including local livestock farms, potential processing locations, and skills within the community.

2. Community Engagement

  • Stakeholder Meetings: Organize discussions with farmers, local businesses, and consumers to gauge interest and gather input.

  • Education and Awareness: Inform the community about the benefits of local processing, including food safety, quality control, and economic impact.

3. Business Model Development

  • Cooperative Structure: Explore models like cooperatives where farmers can jointly invest in and share the benefits of a processing facility.

  • Funding Options: Identify potential funding sources such as grants, loans, and local investment initiatives to support startup costs.

4. Facility Planning

  • Site Selection: Choose a suitable site for the processing facility that is compliant with local zoning laws and accessible to farmers.

  • Design and Equipment: Plan the layout of the facility, ensuring it meets health and safety standards and is equipped with necessary tools and technology.

5. Regulatory Compliance

  • Permits and Licenses: Navigate the regulatory landscape by obtaining necessary permits for building and operating a processing facility, including health and safety certifications.

  • Best Practices: Establish standard operating procedures that comply with industry regulations and ensure food safety.

6. Skilled Workforce Development

  • Training Programs: Recruit and train staff in meat processing techniques, food safety, and customer service.

  • Workshops and Certifications: Offer ongoing education and certifications to ensure quality and standards are maintained.

7. Establishing Supply Chains

  • Local Contracts: Create agreements with local farmers to supply livestock, ensuring a steady flow of products for processing.

  • Direct Marketing Channels: Develop relationships with local markets, restaurants, and consumers to create direct sales opportunities for processed meat.

8. Marketing and Promotion

  • Brand Development: Create a strong brand identity that emphasizes local sourcing, quality, and sustainability.

  • Community Programs: Engage in local events, farmers’ markets, and food festivals to promote products and educate consumers about local meat sourcing.

9. Feedback and Improvement

  • Customer Surveys: Collect feedback from customers and farmers regarding their experiences and suggestions for improvement.

  • Quality Control: Implement regular quality assessments and adjust practices based on community needs and market trends.

10. Sustainability Practices

  • Waste Management: Develop strategies for managing by-products, such as composting organics and recycling, to minimize waste.

  • Environmental Consideration: Utilize sustainable practices in operations, such as energy-efficient machinery and humane slaughter techniques.

By following these key steps, communities can promote efficient, ethical, and sustainable local butcher and slaughter processing operations that benefit local economies and consumers alike.


A couple of examples. For long term goals and ideas.

http://www.arizmendi.coop/about-arizmendi-association.html




https://www.mondragon-corporation.com/en/


https://share.google/aimode/dhUBZvdtU9IeuNaRa



What are some successful cooperative butcher shops and local food supply chains?

Based on various models across the United States, successful cooperative butcher shops and local food supply chains are typically organized around a shared processing facility, a mobile unit, or a collective marketing brand

Butcher shop and processing facility co-ops

  • Members Cup Premium Butchery

     (Iowa): Launched by the Farmers Co-op Society in Sioux Center, this butcher shop sells meat from its members' farms. This model allows farmers to bring their products from the farm to the customer directly and keeps processing local.

  • Grass Roots Farmers' Cooperative

     (Arkansas): This co-op is an especially relevant example for your location. It connects member farms committed to regenerative agriculture with markets. It provides comprehensive support with processing, distribution, and marketing for its members.

  • Island Grown Farmers Cooperative

     (Washington): This co-op was a pioneer in using a USDA-inspected mobile processing unit (MPU) for red meat. It processes livestock on farms, and a permanent facility handles further processing. This model significantly increases processing capacity for local farmers.

  • Bay Area Ranchers Cooperative

     (California): Formed in 2020 to solve a local meat processing bottleneck, this co-op operates a mobile slaughter unit and a cut-and-wrap facility. It is funded by member investments and processes cattle, sheep, goats, and hogs.

  • Country Natural Beef

     (Oregon): This rancher cooperative has been successful for decades in marketing grass-fed beef directly to consumers, proving the long-term viability of the co-op model for meat producers. 

Co-ops focused on marketing and distribution

  • Food and Meat Co-Op

     (Utah): This cooperative successfully connects consumers with local producers by bypassing the traditional retail supply chain. This approach offers significant savings and a fresher product to its members by eliminating the middleman.

  • Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) Meat Programs: Many individual farms and groups operate successful meat CSAs, which are essentially subscription programs for meat. Customers prepay for a package size for a specified period, giving the producers a reliable revenue stream. 

Key lessons from successful models

  • Strong Producer-Processor Relationships: Mutually beneficial relationships and clear communication are essential for maintaining a successful local meat supply chain.

  • Sufficient and Consistent Volume: Successful processing facilities require a consistent and sufficient volume of animals from members to be financially sustainable.

  • Marketing and Business Support: Many producer co-ops succeed by offering support for marketing, distribution, and business management, which are often major challenges for individual farmers.

  • Focus on a Specific Market: Several examples, such as those focusing on grass-fed beef or specific regional markets, show that targeting a niche can be a viable strategy. 

Saturday, March 22, 2025

Investigative journalist Greg Palast has reported on voter suppression in 2024 election.

 

Investigative journalist Greg Palast has extensively reported on voter suppression and disenfranchisement leading up to the 2024 elections. He asserts that such tactics significantly impacted the election's outcome, suggesting that Vice President Kamala Harris would have won the presidency if not for these practices. Palast highlights methods like purging voter rolls and rejecting ballots, particularly affecting Black voters.

The Chicago Crusader

In his analysis, Palast claims that voter suppression cost Harris approximately 3.56 million votes across states like Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia. He argues that if all legal voters had been allowed to vote and all legal ballots counted, Harris would have secured 286 electoral votes, thereby winning the presidency.

KKFI

Beyond Palast's findings, other reports indicate that in 2024, an estimated 4 million Americans were unable to vote due to felony disenfranchisement laws. These laws, present in 48 states, disproportionately affect communities of color and have been criticized for undermining democratic participation.

The Sentencing Project

Additionally, the Brennan Center for Justice noted that 2024 saw significant legislative activity concerning voting laws, with numerous states enacting measures that could either restrict or expand voting access. This surge in legislation reflects ongoing debates about election integrity and voter access in the United States.

Brennan Center for Justice

These developments underscore the critical importance of addressing voter suppression and ensuring equitable access to the ballot box in future elections.

Recent Developments in Voter Suppression and Election Integrity

Favicon Times Union

Commentary: The SAVE Act would erode America's hard-won voting rights

Today

Favicon The New Yorker

Trump Is Still Trying to Undermine Elections

6 days ago

Favicon AP News

Top DC prosecutor, who promoted false 2020 voter fraud claims, forms 'election accountability' unit


Tariffs are usefull and a good tool, if used well!

 

 

 

 

Alexander Hamilton’s plan for using tariffs was a key part of his broader economic vision for the United States. As the first Secretary of the Treasury, Hamilton saw tariffs as a way to protect American industries, generate government revenue, and encourage economic independence from foreign powers. His reasoning was laid out in his 1791 report Report on Manufactures. Here’s a breakdown of his approach:

1. Protecting Domestic Industry (Protectionism)

  • Hamilton argued that new American industries needed time to grow and compete with well-established European manufacturers, particularly those in Britain.
  • Tariffs on imported goods would make foreign products more expensive, encouraging Americans to buy domestically produced goods.
  • This was a strategy to foster self-sufficiency and reduce reliance on foreign imports.

2. Raising Government Revenue

  • Since the young U.S. government had little ability to directly tax citizens (income taxes didn’t exist yet), tariffs provided a major source of federal revenue.
  • This revenue was essential for repaying debts from the Revolutionary War and funding essential government functions.

3. Encouraging Economic Diversification

  • Hamilton wanted the U.S. to develop a strong manufacturing sector instead of relying solely on agriculture.
  • Tariffs, along with government subsidies and infrastructure development, would help build a balanced economy that combined both industry and farming.

4. Reducing Foreign Dependence

  • By protecting American industries, Hamilton hoped to lessen U.S. dependence on British and European goods.
  • He saw economic independence as vital to national security and long-term prosperity.

Outcome and Opposition

  • Hamilton’s tariff policies were partially implemented, but they sparked opposition, especially from agrarian Southern states. Many Southern leaders, including Thomas Jefferson, feared tariffs would disproportionately benefit Northern manufacturers at the expense of Southern farmers, who relied on foreign trade.

Ultimately, Hamilton’s vision laid the groundwork for American industrialization, and his ideas about using tariffs for economic protection and growth influenced U.S. trade policy for much of the 19th and 20th centuries.

 

Monday, October 21, 2024

Some one asked, "How can we Transition to a Green Economy without Causing a Recession?"

 

1. Gradual Subsidy Phase-Out for Fossil Fuels and Agribusiness

  • Year 1–3: Begin by identifying all direct and indirect subsidies to fossil fuel producers and large-scale agribusinesses reliant on synthetic inputs. Start with a gradual reduction of 10–20% per year to avoid economic shock waves, giving businesses time to adjust.

  • Reinvest Savings: Redirect a portion of these savings into retraining workers in fossil fuel and industrial agriculture sectors for jobs in renewable energy, organic farming and agriculture, and regenerative practices.

2. Redirecting Subsidies to Sustainable Alternatives

  • Organic and Regenerative Farming Support: Allocate funds towards scaling up subsidies for small and mid-sized organic and regenerative farms, providing access to capital, technology, and research. Increase subsidies by 20–30% annually over the first 3–5 years.

  • Transition Assistance for Farmers: Provide grants and low-interest loans for conventional farmers transitioning to organic and regenerative practices and soil restoration. This ensures the farming community can adopt sustainable methods without financial hardship.

3. Incentives for Innovation

  • Research and Development: Invest heavily in R&D for sustainable agriculture, focusing on developing low-input systems, crop diversity, water management, and soil restoration technologies.

  • Tax Breaks and Incentives: Offer tax breaks for companies and farms that adopt carbon-sequestering practices, reduce water use, and eliminate synthetic chemicals.

4. Carbon Pricing and Eco-Taxes

  • Introduce Carbon Pricing: Implement a gradual carbon tax system that directly affects fossil fuel companies. Set a carbon price that increases yearly, forcing the industry to innovate or lose profit.

  • Chemical Tax: Introduce an Eco-tax on synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides that degrade ecosystems. The revenue generated can further fund regenerative farming practices.

5. Energy Sector Transition

  • Subsidize Renewable Energy Development: Use funds redirected from fossil fuel subsidies to subsidize wind, solar, micro-hydro, and other renewable energy projects. These sectors can absorb displaced fossil fuel workers and continue driving job creation.

  • Infrastructure for Decentralized Energy: Build decentralized energy grids using local renewable sources. This helps reduce reliance on large, inefficient, and polluting energy production while offering reliable, localized power systems.

6. Legislative Action & Lobbying Reform

  • Cut Corporate Lobbying Influence: Push for stricter rules around lobbying from fossil fuel and agribusiness corporations, reducing their influence on policy makers.

  • Bipartisan Coalition Building: Work with both progressive and conservative groups to present regenerative agriculture and renewable energy as solutions to both economic and environmental issues, thus building wide-ranging political support.

7. Job Creation and Economic Stability

  • Green Jobs Program: Develop a nationwide green jobs initiative to ensure that workers in the fossil fuel and conventional agriculture sectors can easily transition to jobs in renewable energy, regenerative agriculture, and environmental restoration.

  • Infrastructure Development: Focus on public investment in green infrastructure projects (e.g., sustainable water systems, efficient mass transit, green electricity, carbon neutral and carbon negative fuels, etc) that create jobs while building resilience to climate change.

8. Public Awareness Campaign

  • Education and Awareness: Launch a campaign to educate the public on the benefits of organic, regenerative agriculture and the economic advantages of moving away from fossil fuels. This will create consumer demand for sustainable products and reduce resistance to policy changes.

Conclusion:

This plan ensures a smooth transition by scaling back harmful subsidies gradually while scaling up support for regenerative and sustainable industries. By investing in job training, education, and technology, it can be done without triggering a recession. What’s most critical is building a broad coalition to push these reforms and dismantle the power of corporations that continue to profit from destruction.

Opening Talk: Regenerative Farming for Farm Survival and Renewal

   Opening Talk: Regenerative Farming for Farm Survival and Renewal Friends and neighbors, I want to begin by saying something simple and ho...