Investigative journalist Greg Palast has reported on voter suppression in 2024 election.

 

Investigative journalist Greg Palast has extensively reported on voter suppression and disenfranchisement leading up to the 2024 elections. He asserts that such tactics significantly impacted the election's outcome, suggesting that Vice President Kamala Harris would have won the presidency if not for these practices. Palast highlights methods like purging voter rolls and rejecting ballots, particularly affecting Black voters.

The Chicago Crusader

In his analysis, Palast claims that voter suppression cost Harris approximately 3.56 million votes across states like Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia. He argues that if all legal voters had been allowed to vote and all legal ballots counted, Harris would have secured 286 electoral votes, thereby winning the presidency.

KKFI

Beyond Palast's findings, other reports indicate that in 2024, an estimated 4 million Americans were unable to vote due to felony disenfranchisement laws. These laws, present in 48 states, disproportionately affect communities of color and have been criticized for undermining democratic participation.

The Sentencing Project

Additionally, the Brennan Center for Justice noted that 2024 saw significant legislative activity concerning voting laws, with numerous states enacting measures that could either restrict or expand voting access. This surge in legislation reflects ongoing debates about election integrity and voter access in the United States.

Brennan Center for Justice

These developments underscore the critical importance of addressing voter suppression and ensuring equitable access to the ballot box in future elections.

Recent Developments in Voter Suppression and Election Integrity

Times Union

Commentary: The SAVE Act would erode America's hard-won voting rights

Today

The New Yorker

Trump Is Still Trying to Undermine Elections

6 days ago

AP News

Top DC prosecutor, who promoted false 2020 voter fraud claims, forms 'election accountability' unit

Tariffs are usefull and a good tool, if used well!

 

 

 

 

Alexander Hamilton’s plan for using tariffs was a key part of his broader economic vision for the United States. As the first Secretary of the Treasury, Hamilton saw tariffs as a way to protect American industries, generate government revenue, and encourage economic independence from foreign powers. His reasoning was laid out in his 1791 report Report on Manufactures. Here’s a breakdown of his approach:

1. Protecting Domestic Industry (Protectionism)

• Hamilton argued that new American industries needed time to grow and compete with well-established European manufacturers, particularly those in Britain.
• Tariffs on imported goods would make foreign products more expensive, encouraging Americans to buy domestically produced goods.
• This was a strategy to foster self-sufficiency and reduce reliance on foreign imports.

2. Raising Government Revenue

• Since the young U.S. government had little ability to directly tax citizens (income taxes didn’t exist yet), tariffs provided a major source of federal revenue.
• This revenue was essential for repaying debts from the Revolutionary War and funding essential government functions.

3. Encouraging Economic Diversification

• Hamilton wanted the U.S. to develop a strong manufacturing sector instead of relying solely on agriculture.
• Tariffs, along with government subsidies and infrastructure development, would help build a balanced economy that combined both industry and farming.

4. Reducing Foreign Dependence

• By protecting American industries, Hamilton hoped to lessen U.S. dependence on British and European goods.
• He saw economic independence as vital to national security and long-term prosperity.

Outcome and Opposition

• Hamilton’s tariff policies were partially implemented, but they sparked opposition, especially from agrarian Southern states. Many Southern leaders, including Thomas Jefferson, feared tariffs would disproportionately benefit Northern manufacturers at the expense of Southern farmers, who relied on foreign trade.

Ultimately, Hamilton’s vision laid the groundwork for American industrialization, and his ideas about using tariffs for economic protection and growth influenced U.S. trade policy for much of the 19th and 20th centuries.